City State of Kish / Kic
The founders of Kish (modern Tall al-Uhaymir, 80km south of Baghdad) were Sumerians: non-Semitic black-haired people of an unknown origin. Their occupation of the site at Kish began in the Jemdet Nasr Period (3200-2900 BC), but this was ended by the archaeologically-attested flood of between 2900-2800BC in Sumer, which left deposits in Kish. However, it is possible that the city was less badly affected than Shuruppak, as Kish quickly assumed the kingship. It flourished i
n the full blooming of Sumerian civilization in the Early Dynastic Period. The city was of major importance in the early third millennium BC (the Early Dynastic II Period of the twenty-sixth century BC), but it declined in importance later, remaining in occupation until the Sassanian period.
Certainly in later times, and quite possible from the very earliest times, whichever king controlled the city of Kish was recognised as šar kiššati (king of Kish), and was considered pre-eminent in Sumer, possibly because this was where the two rivers approached, and whoever controlled Kish ultimately controlled the irrigation systems of the other cities downstream. Many rulers from other cities who achieved dominance in Sumer also claimed the title for themselves.
The First Dynasty kings of Kish are also known as the First Kingship (of Sumer, after the flood). According to the Sumerian king list, a total of 39 kings ruled for 14,409 + X years, three months and three and-a-half days, four times (dynasties) in Kish. Here, List 1 is primarily used, backed up by List 2 and List 3 (see Sumer for details).
First Dynasty
c.2900? - 2650? BC
This is the first set of entries on the Sumerian list comprising kings 1-23. Twenty-three kings ruled for 24,510 years, three months, and 3.5 days. The earliest names are semi-legendary, but were probably based on real ante-diluvian rulers. About half of them have Semitic names, meaning that Semites were at least established in the northern part of Mesopotamia by this ancient date and that not all interaction between the two groups was hostile.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
fl c.2900 BC
|
Gaur / Jucur / (Jushur)
|
Ruled for 1,200 years. (From the WB-62 list.)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gulla-Nidaba-annapad / Kullassina-bel
|
Ruled for 960/900 years.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Palakinatim / Nanjiclicma
|
Ruled for 900/670? years.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nangishlishma / En-tarah-ana
|
Ruled for ?/420 years, 3 mths, 3.5 days.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bahina / Babum
|
Ruled for ?/300 years.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buanum / Puannum
|
Ruled for 840/240 years.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kalibum
|
Ruled for 960/900 years.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Galumum / Kalumum
|
Ruled for 840/900 years.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Zukakip / Zuqaqip
|
Ruled for 900/600 years.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atab / Aba
|
Ruled for 600 years.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mashda / Macda
|
Son. Ruled for 840/720 years.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
fl c.2750 BC
|
Arurim / Arwium / Arpu-Rim
|
Son. Ruled for 720 years.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
c.2750 BC
|
The Sumerian king list and excavations in Iraq show evidence of a flood at Shuruppak somewhere between 2900-2750 BC, which extends as far as Kish, whose king, Etana, supposedly founds the first Sumerian dynasty after the flood: 'after the Flood, the kingship was handed down from Heaven a second time, this time to the city of Kish which became the seat of kingship.'
|
No comments:
Post a Comment